David Martin MEP

Labour Member of the European Parliament and one of the six MEPs representing Scotland in Brussels and Strasbourg

Latest News

In September 2014 I voted to keep Scotland in the UK.  In June 2016 I voted to keep the UK in the European Union.

Scotland voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU. Edinburgh a city I have represented in this House for 33 years voted 75% to 25% to remain.

The feeling in Scotland is that we are being dragged out of Europe against our will - a feeling only compounded by Mrs May's determination to pursue a hard BREXIT.

The resolution we are about to vote on recognises this fact but provides no solution.

The Council document calls for flexible and imaginative solutions to be found for Ireland - I agree, but ask why not also for Scotland?

The Scottish Government has put forward an imaginative and flexible solution for Scotland.
It deserves serious consideration in this house.

If the UK is not flexible in these talks, the UK will not only be leaving the European Union. The UK will cease to exist.

Statement from David Martin MEP at today's European Parliamentary debate on BREXIT

In September 2014 I voted to keep Scotland in the UK.  In June 2016 I voted to keep the UK in the European Union.

On Article 50 day, as Mrs May sends her letter to the European Council outlining Britain’s plans to leave the 28-member bloc, David Martin, Scotland’s most senior MEP, said:

“With indyref2 confirmed yesterday and Article 50 today, it seems like the UK as I know it is crumbling before my eyes.

The next few years will once again be spent debating the future of both our unions, while bigger domestic problems north and south of the border once again get ignored.

In little more than six years, the Tories have destroyed Britain’s international credibility and brought Scotland to the brink. Unfortunately, it seems the worst is yet to come.

The Brexiteers say now is the time for Remainers to be quiet and get behind Britain. On the contrary, now is the time for us to make our voices heard even more. We cannot support this disastrous project.”

Now is not the time to be quiet and accept Brexit. Now is the time to make our voices heard

On Article 50 day, as Mrs May sends her letter to the European Council outlining Britain’s plans to leave the 28-member bloc, David Martin, Scotland’s most senior MEP, said:

The European Parliament voted today to back new laws for the mandatory regulation of minerals imported into the EU, designed to break the link between armed conflict and the mineral trade - regulations Britain must maintain after Brexit, lest it regress to unethical trading practices, Labour MEPs have warned.

Scottish Labour MEP David Martin, Member of the European Parliament international trade committee, said:

“Labour MEPs knew a voluntary system would not have been effective and pushed hard for a mandatory approach and a broader coverage of the whole supply chain - this is a big victory for us. We can now show to our trading partners that the EU continues to be at the forefront of global efforts to create more transparent, responsible and sustainable business practices.

“Today’s vote represents a landmark step forward in ensuring responsibly-sourced products on our shelves. We cannot tolerate a situation where consumers buying jewellery or electronic products are unwittingly financing conflicts in some of the world’s poorest, most unstable countries.

“EU citizens have the right to know that the products they buy do not indirectly finance dictatorships abroad. It was unacceptable that the EU, through trade in minerals, was indirectly fuelling conflicts and human rights abuses in countries such as the DRC - and it would be truly unforgivable if the UK resiled from these new laws after Brexit and regressed to trading unethically.”
 

Notes:

1. The regulation now covers mandatory due diligence for smelters, refiners and importers of minerals and metals of 3TG (gold, titanium and tantalum-tungsten), whose imports exceed a specified annual threshold - ie. the vast majority of the imported volumes of each mineral and metal into the EU should be covered by due diligence requirements, preferably reaching full coverage of the imports of minerals and metals.

2. The OECD due diligence guidelines must serve as the overarching principle of this regulation - the recognition of existing and future (industry) due diligence schemes is a central element of the regulation. Conditions for recognition of such schemes should be robust and aligned with the OECD guidelines.

3. Recycled metals and by-products will not be covered.

4. External expertise will be called upon to provide an indicative list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas, based on existing information and identify high risk areas and areas where additional checks may be needed through a system of "red flags".

5. The European Commission will review the functioning and effectiveness of the Regulation and discuss the review report with European Parliament. The review will assess the adequacy and implementation of the due diligence systems and the latest impact of the scheme on the ground as well as the need for further mandatory measures in order to ensure sufficient leverage of the EU market on the global supply chain of responsibly-traded minerals.

 

As EU gets tough on conflict minerals trade, David Martin MEP warns that the UK cannot regress to unethical trading after Brexit

The European Parliament voted today to back new laws for the mandatory regulation of minerals imported into the EU, designed to break the link between armed conflict and the mineral...


All news items

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.